September 7th, 2009

Happy "Labor Day"... if you are pro-union.

Read this collection of facts and events and tell me if you see a trend -

30+ Czars in the Obama admin that are not appointed by Congress and only vetted by Obama.
They only report to him.

• The new “green” czar is a committed radical by his own admission and only now, when he’s under the spot light does he “apologize” for what he said. He is also a racist of the worst kind. (Thankfully he just resigned)

• Obama appointed an FCC “diversity” Czar, Mark Lloyd. By his own admission and actions, he is a dedicated communist and has the goal of shutting down free speech and conservative talk radio via the “fairness doctrine”. The new FCC czar believes that Hugo Chavez is correct and that if he had taken over the media sooner his revolution would have succeeded sooner. He is proposing such activities here in the US – Example of his statements:

“The Corporation for Public Broadcasting (CPB) must be reformed along democratic lines and funded on a substantial level,” Lloyd wrote in his book.

“Federal and regional broadcast operations and local stations should be funded at levels commensurate with or above those spending levels at which commercial operations are funded,” Lloyd wrote. “This funding should come from license fees charged to commercial broadcasters. Funding should not come from congressional appropriations. Sponsorship should be prohibited at all public broadcasters.”

And:
"our work was not simply convincing policy makers of the logic and morality of our arguments. We understood that we were in a struggle for power against an opponent, the commercial broadcasters."

And finally he wrote this:

“the purpose of free speech is warped to protect global corporations and block rules that would promote democratic governance."

• Obama just appointed another czar. Ron Bloom. He is a well educated Harvard MBA (as if that makes him smart) and worked on the auto group that presided over Government Motors and Fiat’s take-over of Chrysler. He is defiantly pro-union and was a special assistant to the president of the united steel workers union. Before joining the steelworkers, Bloom was one of the founding partners of Keilin and Bloom, an investment banking firm, where he was involved in numerous transactions on behalf of the Steelworkers, United Auto Workers, Teamsters, Air Line Pilots Association and other unions. And he’s in charge of setting US manufacturing policy? What do you think he will do the companies themselves or the owners? He is to make US competitive with the rest of the world when it’s obvious that jobs are going overseas due to lower cost of employees and, what is not mentioned, a lower tax burden.

See any trending here? Keep reading…

• The US bails out the financial industry and winds up owning a series of major banks. (and we can thank Bush for starting that one)
• The US, along with the unions, now owns GM (Government Motors). The bond holders were wiped out despite legal contracts.
• The President appointed a pay Czar that controls all pay decisions at all nationalized firms or firms that took bailout money.
• Congress (Barney Frank to be precise) now has asked all insurance companies to give to Congress all records relating to pay and other items such events, outings, entertainment, etc. Even if the company was not subsidized by the US government.
• The President wants to talk to our children. First to gain support for his programs as evidenced by his suggestions for “after speech” activities. When he was called out on this he changed it to more moderate activities focusing on staying in school. That’s actually fine by me. What I don’t like is the liberals saying… “give the man a chance…”, “he’s our president so we should support him”… If it were Bush, the liberals would have been SCREAMING foul play. They never supported Bush even though HE was the President. So why should we be different in our dissent?!
• The President has come down on the side of Hamas and not our long standing ally Israel as seen in recent news articles. He’s favors the radicals that would destroy democracy over a democracy that supports the US.
• The National Endowment for the Arts recently asked Hollywood film makers, writers and poets to start producing literature in favor of Obama’s socialist agenda. This is government, i.e. your money and mine, being spent on this work. The NEA back peddled on this but recently proof via emails and memos have emerged showing them as, in the polite terms of politics, “less than truthful”. I’m not a Politian so I can call them a “Damn Liar”
• Obama and Congress are trying to pass a bill that would give the President vast powers over the Internet even for commercial operations. It would be against some cyber threat yet to be defined. Isn’t that what the government just did in Iran?
• The Obama administration wants to reinstate a pro-Chavez president in Honduras even though he was legally removed the their congress.
• Manning Marable, a leader of the Communist Party offshoot Committees of Correspondence for Democracy&Socialism claims that Obama "understands what socialism is. A lot of the people working with him are, indeed, socialists with backgrounds in the Communist Party or as independent Marxists. There are a lot of people like that in Chicago who have worked with him for years..."
• The massive amount of money that is going to organizations such as Acorn that supported Obama.
• The US governments attempt to take over healthcare. Read the bill if you are in doubt. All 1019 pages if you dare. It will scare you. And with Social Security, Medicare, etc we think that they can financially run 17% of economy? If you think that, then you are delusional.
• Flag.gov email asking for tips on “fishy” behavior.
• Cookies on your computer that track whenever you’ve been on a government website. This used to be illegal but was recently changed.
• The government using outside companies to track and contact you. Are they gathering information?
• And lastly this statement by the, at the time, presidential candidate Obama:
“We cannot continue to rely on our military in order to achieve the national security objectives we've set. We've got to have a civilian national security force that's just as powerful, just as strong, just as well-funded.”

Who makes up the civilian “army” and who is this unseen and unidentified threat within the US? Is it you and me? Is it the drug runners? Illegal aliens? Is it the people that carry the “don’t tread on me flag”? Is it conservatism? WHO? Don’t we have a national guard that is used for civil unrest?

What scares me is the creation of the “army”. I’m a history buff. I love history and the fact that if you don’t study history, you are doomed to repeat it. So with that, remember the “brown shirts”. If you don’t know what they are, look it up on the internet. Also, look up the “red army” of the early 1900 in Russia. There are plenty of examples of such “armies”.

I’m also not a conspiracy advocate but in my reading, and I’ve done quite a bit, there does seem to be a massive trend taking place with some very unnerving undercurrents and with organizations that are divisive to the US and democracy.

Don’t go blindly into the night…..

You get what you allow to be done to you…..